Skip to main content

techsiagus.com

Services · Cyber Security

Find the weaknesses before someone else does.

Security work only matters if it changes something. Every engagement ends with a prioritised set of findings, a remediation plan and a target architecture — not a scan report.

  • ISO 27001
  • NIST
  • Risk-rated findings

Perimeter · live

Assessed against Recognised frameworks Output that stands up to an auditor as well as an engineer.
Line coverage Architecture to source code Five offerings, from perimeter design to application review.
The position

A scan report is not a result.

Security work only matters if it changes something. Every engagement ends with a prioritised set of findings, a remediation plan and a target architecture.

We assess against recognised frameworks so the output stands up to an auditor as well as an engineer.

What the engagement leaves behind

01
Prioritised findings
Risk-rated, so the order of work is decided before anyone opens a ticket.
02
A remediation plan
Guidance attached to every finding, not a list handed over without a route out.
03
A target architecture
The state the estate is being moved towards, with its controls designed in.
Services

5 offerings in this line.

From the shape of the perimeter down to how a single application handles a password.

5 Offerings
Frameworks & standards

Findings that map to a named standard, not a house opinion.

What we assess against

ISO 27001
Information security management
Findings are mapped to specific control clauses rather than a generic checklist — the shape an assessment needs when the output has to satisfy a certification body or an enterprise procurement questionnaire.
NIST
Identify, protect, detect, respond, recover
Useful where a client's own compliance obligations, insurer, or parent organisation already expect a NIST-aligned posture, so the assessment speaks the same language as the audit that follows it.
How we work

The same four stages, whatever the engagement.

  1. 01

    Assess

    Establish the current state against your actual requirements — scope, users, performance expectations and compliance obligations.

  2. 02

    Design

    Produce the target architecture with its security controls designed in, plus the tactical plan to reach it.

  3. 03

    Deploy

    Build, configure and cut over — leaving as-built documentation and standard operating procedures behind.

  4. 04

    Run

    Operate, monitor and maintain the compliance position, so the estate does not drift back from the design.

Questions

Before you get in touch.

Can you work alongside an internal security team or an existing MSSP?

Yes. The first piece of work on any engagement is agreeing where the boundary sits — which systems, which escalation path, which decisions stay with your team — and writing it down, so responsibility is never ambiguous mid-engagement.

Is the assessment independent of any design work you did for us?

Assessments are carried out against the recognised frameworks above and findings are reported as they are found, regardless of who produced the underlying design — including us. Say so early if you need a fully separate assessor for governance reasons, and we will structure it that way.

Can testing be scoped to specific systems only?

Yes — scope is agreed up front, whether that is a single application, a production versus staging boundary, or a defined subnet. Nothing outside the agreed scope is touched without a separate, explicit sign-off.

What do we actually receive at the end of an engagement?

The three things described above: risk-rated findings, a remediation plan attached to each one, and a target architecture with its controls designed in — not a raw scan export.